Post-Prandial Philosophy — Inside the Classic

(0 User reviews)   321
Allen, Grant, 1848-1899 Project Gutenberg 2006 Not confirmed
Essays Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 42,587
Reading time 186 min
Text sections 4

For Post-Prandial Philosophy — Inside the Classic, the stored edition analysis reports 42,587 words, 3 hr 6 min estimated reading time, and 4 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 21.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Essays,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Grant Allen's 1894 essays, originally in The Westminster Gazette, blend evolutionary theory with social critique. The opening piece on language competition sets a pattern of applying biological metaphors to culture, while later essays examine marriage decline and class habits with a conversational, post-prandial tone.
Share

Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.

Read on Project Gutenberg

Grant Allen opens Post-Prandial Philosophy with a conversational gambit: a Positivist friend at Venice insists Italian will be the future language, a notion Allen dismantles by arguing that language spread is as uncontrollable as barometric pressure. This essay, “The Struggle for Life Among Languages,” immediately establishes the book’s method—applying evolutionary concepts to cultural phenomena. Allen’s voice is that of a dinner-table disputant: urbane, slightly ironic, and fond of sweeping biological analogies. He treats English as a voracious organism swallowing German and Scandinavian, a metaphor he will extend to aristocracy, education, and marriage. The preface confirms these pieces were “crystallisations into writing of ideas suggested in familiar conversation,” and the text retains that extemporaneous quality, with digressions and direct addresses to a presumed interlocutor.

Conversational Cadence and Biological Metaphor

Allen’s prose mimics the rhythms of after-dinner talk: he uses rhetorical questions (“Fancy a young man who believes in Malthus!”), dashes for asides, and sudden shifts from abstract principle to concrete example. In “The Struggle for Life Among Languages,” he moves from Comte’s sentimentalism to a brisk survey of English expansion, then to a prediction about half-century outcomes. The biological framework is explicit: languages “gain and spread” like species; English is “swallowing up” rivals. This metaphor recurs in “The Decline of Marriage,” where he compares young men’s reluctance to wed to the reproductive failure of caged birds or colonised peoples. Allen does not merely borrow Darwinian language; he structures arguments as natural-historical observations, complete with counterexamples (“colonists often increase with rapidity”) and appeals to Herbert Spencer’s Principles of Biology. The effect is a hybrid of scientific lecture and clubroom banter.

The Weakening Impulse: Marriage and Modernity

In “The Decline of Marriage,” Allen narrows his focus to a single class: men “roughly bounded by a silk hat on Sundays.” He contrasts the “wholesome” impulse of thirty years prior—when young men “rushed by blind instinct into the toils of matrimony”—with contemporary “shilly-shally” and “Laodicean luke-warmness.” The evidence is anecdotal, drawn from his observation of “young men of the middle class around me.” He then pivots to a biological law: “Whatever upsets the balance of the organism … tends first of all to affect the rate of reproduction.” Examples cascade: Tasmanians, Hawaiians, Paraguayans under Jesuit rule. The argument is not statistical but analogical; Allen treats social change as a perturbation of organic equilibrium. His tone shifts from wry to earnest as he cites Spencer, but the conversational frame holds—he imagines a reader objecting (“‘But colonists often increase with rapidity’”), then answers with a qualified “Ay, marry, do they.”

Pace and the Essay as After-Dinner Form

The book’s title is literal: these are post-prandial reflections, meant to be suggestive rather than exhaustive. Allen’s pacing varies from brisk opening gambits to leisurely digressions. In the language essay, he sets up a friend’s remark, then unfolds a counter-argument over several paragraphs, punctuated by short declarative sentences (“Stern need compels”). In the marriage essay, he builds a case through cumulative examples, then breaks into dialogue with an imagined critic. The essays are short—most run a few pages—and each ends without a formal conclusion, trailing off into implication. The preface warns that they “aim at being suggestive rather than exhaustive,” and the text honours that: Allen provokes thought without following every train to its terminus. Readers should expect a series of intellectual starters, not finished arguments, delivered in a voice that is at once authoritative and companionable.

Allen’s essays reward readers who enjoy watching a lively mind apply a single lens—evolutionary biology—to diverse social questions. The pleasure lies less in the conclusions than in the movement of thought: the sudden swerve from language competition to marriage rates, the deft handling of counterexamples, the mock-serious invocation of Malthus. Because the pieces were originally newspaper columns, they can be read in any order; each stands alone. But taken together, they reveal a consistent method: treat every custom as a biological adaptation, and every change as a disturbance of organic balance. That approach, now more than a century old, still provokes thought—which is exactly what Allen intended.

Reading this, I remembered long Sunday lunches at my grandmother’s, where talk drifted from politics to gardening without any clear seam. Grant Allen’s quiet way of treating ideas like living things felt familiar. Later, Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) — Background and Themes gave me that same unhurried sense of a mind wandering, not performing.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Take a moment to reflect on this book

Create a short personal record of your experience with this book.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

Was reading this book enjoyable?

3

Would you recommend this book to another reader?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks